<data xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<row _id="1"><Biologica>Sample ID</Biologica><Client>Sample ID</Client><Station>Name</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>Spotcheck</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>Random whole resorts</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>taxonomy &amp; enumeration</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>Agreement (PTA)</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>Enumeration (PSE)</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="2"><Biologica>19-182-001</Biologica><Client>19SWE10002</Client><Station>HAN02</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="3"><Biologica>19-182-002</Biologica><Client>19SWE10006</Client><Station>AOS01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="4"><Biologica>19-182-003</Biologica><Client>19SWE10009</Client><Station>ATH02</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>0.9622</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="5"><Biologica>19-182-004</Biologica><Client>19SWE10012</Client><Station>AUR01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>0.9871</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="6"><Biologica>19-182-005</Biologica><Client>19SWE10023</Client><Station>PAT01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="7"><Biologica>19-182-006</Biologica><Client>19SWE10026</Client><Station>JEN01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>0.9644</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>0.9795</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>0.9983</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>0.9983</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="8"><Biologica>19-182-007</Biologica><Client>19SWE10028</Client><Station>PAT01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="9"><Biologica>19-182-008</Biologica><Client>19SWE10029</Client><Station>PAT01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>0.9562</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for>0.9886</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>0.9977</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>0.9977</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="10"><Biologica>19-182-009</Biologica><Client>19SWE10039</Client><Station>MAQ01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for>0.9769</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>0.9925</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>0.9963</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="11"><Biologica>19-182-010</Biologica><Client>19SWE10047</Client><Station>JCK03</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>0.988</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="12"><Biologica>19-182-011</Biologica><Client>19SWE10050</Client><Station>HWC02</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>100% of debris resorted</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="13"><Biologica>Average:</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC:>0.9721</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>0.971233333333</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>0.981666666667</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>0.996166666667</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>0.997433333333</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="14"><Biologica /><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="15"><Biologica>Quality Control</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="16"><Biologica>Sorting efficiency:  [(total count – organisms recovered in spot check and/or re-sort) / total count] x 100%</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="17"><Biologica>Spot Check: 25-100% of sample debris resorted for 100% of samples</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="18"><Biologica /><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="19"><Biologica>Table 2. QA Identification for Alberta Government &amp; Parks OSM Wetlands, 2019.</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="20"><Biologica /><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="21"><Biologica>Biologica Sample #</Biologica><Client>Client Sample #</Client><Station>Station Name</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>Agreements</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>Disagreements/ Misidentification</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>Difference in Resolution</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>Difference in Enumeration</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>Total Organisms Found in Original Sample</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="22"><Biologica>19-182-006</Biologica><Client>19SWE10026</Client><Station>JEN01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>61.0</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>1.0</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>3.0</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>2.0</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>611.0</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="23"><Biologica>19-182-008</Biologica><Client>19SWE10029</Client><Station>PAT01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>51.0</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>2.0</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>4.0</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>4.0</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>879.0</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="24"><Biologica>19-182-009</Biologica><Client>19SWE10039</Client><Station>MAQ01</Station><Sorting Efficiency QC:>51.0</Sorting Efficiency QC:><Sorting Efficiency QA:>6.0</Sorting Efficiency QA:><Bray-Curtis similarity for>5.0</Bray-Curtis similarity for><Percent taxonomic>4.0</Percent taxonomic><Percent similarity in>802.0</Percent similarity in></row>
<row _id="25"><Biologica /><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="26"><Biologica>Quality Assurance (QA) Identification Agreement Rate</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="27"><Biologica>Identification Agreement Rate: [(# incorrect identifications/total organisms found in audit) x100%]-100</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
<row _id="28"><Biologica>Enumeration, questionable taxonomic resolution and insufficient taxonomic resolution are not included in the % Agreement Rate</Biologica><Client /><Station /><Sorting Efficiency QC: /><Sorting Efficiency QA: /><Bray-Curtis similarity for /><Percent taxonomic /><Percent similarity in /></row>
</data>
